lindsay lohan proves something by posing nude
As most of you already know, Lindsay Lohan posed nude for New York Magazine this month in a tasteful recreation of some classic Marilyn Monroe photographs by Bert Stern in the 1960s. They even got him to do this shoot on the same set with Miss Lohan.
In doing this, Lindsay proved something to us all. With almost scientific precision (same photographer, same poses, same clothes, same set), she proved she is no Marilyn Monroe. Nice tits and a pretty face do not make you attractive. I can go point by point on flaws in her physical characteristics, but those 10 year old boy hips, absent nipples, and near-melanoma freckles are not the point. She exudes absolutely zero sexuality, no charisma, no appeal whatsoever. Sometimes - most of the time - the mystery is better, and in this case, without a doubt, the promise of the nude Lohan was so much better than the sterile, plumpy, spotty, reality. I will assume her own ego and the shallow whispers of several boytoys convinced her otherwise. A handful of nip-slips and side-boob photos on The Superficial had me convinced. I am glad the record is now straight.
Lindsay Lohan is officially not hot, not sexy, and not attractive in any way. She’s an egomaniac nymphomaniac with a predisposition for skin cancer. She’d better start wearing more clothes and some serious SPF right away.
Instead of the veil, they should have put a giant paperbag over her rancid face and freckly old-lady boobs.
Great review Chris! Hey, here’s a site than ran the photos with the headline Uncanny Resemblance to the Legendary Marilyn Monroe? NOT!
Lol!